Sure- but having said that we come to the question of what level of "dramatic" and what will be the resultant range of frequencies that will (or not) be reduced.
If we run a test of the noise reduction for each of the materials you mention, we'll be able to plot a curve on a chart showing how much sound is passed at a particular frequency.
So if we start at 200 cycles and go up to 4000 (the speech range, the music range would be higher) we would have peaks and valleys.
Some materials would enhance the curve, their peaks falling over anothers valley, but others might not, by matching valley to valley.
We don't know, (in dealing with materials that are not tested this way), what the result will be, so it's a crap shoot all the way.
Another issue is that the studding passes sound quite readily from wall to wall- ignoring whats between it. This would be alleviated somewhat by using resilient channel, soundclips
http://soundproofing.org/infopages/channel.htmor at least the "Poor mans soundproofing: padding tape.
"Super Soundproofing Tape", a 1/8"thick black vinyl-nitrile tape with self-adhesive backing. Same material as our absorbent mat. Wrap pipes, ducts or stick on metal panels (inside computers too!) to reduce noise transfer and vibration. Very effective as an additional isolation padding for Studs, Resilient or Hat channel.
Use the 4" width cut into squares to sandwich between wall panels (Drywall and Soundboard/Homasote) for improved sound control and frequency response.
Use the green 1 7/16" width on "hat" channel or wall stud facing and resilient channel (RC)for additional padding. Use the 3" and/or 4" for joists and beams.
http://soundproofing.org/images/RC-1-with_tape_proof.jpgFind out more about other tape.
http://www.soundproofing.org/infopages/Tape.htmSuper Soundproofing Co